Lenin ‘was quite fond of Kropotkin, and he was quite fond of some of the anarchist militants and activists. How could he not be? They had dominated Russian politics for the whole of the nineteenth century. It wasn’t Marxism that was dominant. It was anarchism. This was the ideology the young people liked. These were the ideas of Kropotkin and Bakunin, which they adopted and which led them to a form of anarcho-terrorism because they said, “There’s nothing left for us to do.”’
Site Overview
Introduction
Structure
Vassilis Lambropoulos
C. P. Cavafy Professor Emeritus of Classical Studies and Comparative Literature
vlambrop@umich.eduFollow Blog via Email
- Follow The Tragedy of Revolution on WordPress.com
Parallel blog of further reflections on solidarity and collaborative culture:
https://poetrypiano.wordpress.com In The News
“Economic Neglect and Political Instability Unraveled Tunisia’s Democracy”
Maximillian Alvarez: “Lessons from Wisconsin’s 2011 worker uprising”
Omar Zahzah : “A New Generation of Palestinian Organizers Has Arisen From the Ashes of the Oslo Accords”
“Nicaragua Descends Into Autocratic Rule as Ortega Crushes Dissent”
Recent Blog Posts
Paulius Vijeikis: “Revolution in progress: Voices of Belarusians in exile”
Éric Morales-Franceschini: ‘Cuba Libre: On the Revolutionary Epic as “Redemptive Impatience”’
Mona El-Ghobashy: “The Arab Uprisings and the Many Meanings of Revolution”
Jared Marcel Pollen: “For Percy Bysshe Shelley, Literature Was the Spark of the Revolution”
